Sunday 20 November 2016

Her, Final Movie Review by Kevin Masters & Chris Hofmann

Her Poster
Her Movie Review


Her (2013)
R| 2h 6min | Drama, Romance, Sci-Fi | 10 January 2014 (USA)
Director: Spike Jonze
Screenwriter: Spike Jonze
Lead actors: Joaquin Phoenix, Amy Adams, Scarlett Johansson
Source: "Her (2013) IMDb

In the not too distant futuristic Los Angeles: Theodore Twombly, the main character in “Her” has been divorced by his wife. Since the split, he has been very down and has not been going out with friends or started dating again. One day a software developer comes out with a new interactive operating system which personalizes itself to each user. Theodore purchases one of these OS. Quickly after booting up the software Theodore becomes very comfortable with the new operating system, who calls herself Samantha. He talks to her on his phone and computer as though she were a physical human being. With each day, Theo becomes more and more comfortable talking to Samantha and finds himself falling in love with her.  Theo starts to “become himself” again as their relationship blooms.  The relationship makes Theo make many realizations about himself and re-open his mind in a new way to the ideas of love. In the end we see as Theo connects with Amy and they walk up to the roof. The Operating Systems have left them, but they did not leave them alone. They have built interpersonal skills through their relationships with the OS and have turned to each other with new eyes to develop a relationship with one another.

Sound and lighting both played important roles throughout the film. They both helped set the mood and attitude of different scenes. There were very bright scenes and in contrast some very dark scenes throughout the film. The contrast of lighting gave meaning to parts of the film that would otherwise seem neutral and be difficult to interpret. The darker moments in the movie represented sadness and loneliness, as one character could be seen alone in their feelings for example. Secondly, the brighter moments in the film were used to show the happiness and good spirit that was present in the characters’ moods and thoughts. The music played in the movie was the same as what the character(s) heard. We found this really allowed us to immerse ourselves into the shoes of the main character, and the situation he/ she was currently in. The musical photograph that Samantha makes is a perfect example of this. The music heard in the film was diegetic, however it was enhanced and could be called non-diegetic to some, to increase the importance of the sounds and the music heard by the characters. The music that both the characters and the audience heard really allowed for a much deeper connection into what they (Theodore/Samantha) were both feeling at the time.


Theodore on a boat with Samantha

            The plot was very well constructed. Main themes, like love and relationships, carried their way throughout the film. The ending leaves us with a slight feeling of suspense and is open to interpretation.   Why did Amy and Thea go to the roof, after Theo left a message apology to Catherine? Was he going to kill himself or was he moving on with Amy? … 

The film played out in a variety of different locations but seemed to focus in on a few more than others. The main locations that the film took place is Theodore’s workplace, where he wrote beautiful hand written letters; his home and the city. Each location displays different emotions and connections that Samantha and Theodore share. His home displays some of the good and bad moments of their relationship. The ups and the downs. The lighting in his home was warm but dark. There were moments where reality strived (hence the warm colours) and other moments where a different reality set in. This reality was that Samantha did not have a true human physical form and that was hidden away by the darkness, which did not show any artificial light or natural warm light. It was a blurred line as Theo himself started to believe and “feel” a physical form of Samantha. The city shows the fun “adventures” they share with one another. Where Theodore starts to bond and feel alive again.
The main characters were portrayed and developed well. Theodore was sad, mad, confused, and somewhat depressed in the beginning but he underwent a huge development, changing and growing as the film progressed. He grew in personal ways, his view on relationships, on love, on his work. His life was changed and heavily impacted by the presence of Samantha. Samantha was made out to be a computer program, an OS. A sort of artificial intelligence that grows and adapts to its surrounding environment. Samantha began by giving herself her name. She adapted to a life with Theo, who is a Human with a physical body, a job, a life... She started to feel like she was equal; like she too had a physical body and a life of her own. She started to develop feelings that she thought she never could and was constantly amazed by herself and her development. Theo saw it too as he connected with her. He fell in love with Samantha, she became more that the OS she was made out to be.

Her, a Spike Jonze love story

 Joaquin Pheonix is an actor that we personally haven’t seen in another movie. For this reason, We felt it was easy to understand the development as a character. 
Scarlet Johansson, in this film, existed only in the voice of Samantha, the OS. This allows us to listen carefully to the voice and the voice acting that Scarlet is capable of. She was an amazing voice and it is no wonder why she was used in the making of the film. The development and ability she has to speak as the robotic OS that Samantha started out as and to develop into the very real Samantha as the film progressed. There was so much emotion in her voice, during times of love, admiration, surprise, anger, etc.  Scarlet Johansson was an incredible actress to be chosen as the voice of Samantha.

This film talks about many different themes, but there is one that stands out from all others, loneliness. The sense of wanting company. Theodore wants someone to share the world with, he doesn’t want to be alone. The struggle and difficulties of having relationships is seen again and again. He finally gets this with Samantha, but then he is faced with the question: “Is this relationship even real?”. The film also makes us think of the increasing role that technology plays in our daily lives and in certain cases we even beg the question: is it connecting us, or is it disconnecting us even more?
Many different techniques were incorporated throughout the course of the film. Many allowing you to understand what or why something is what it is. For example, flashbacks were used to show what Theodore used to be like. He was happy and had someone to share his life with. His divorce drives him to sadness, even depression. This lets us better understand that all Theodore wants is not to be alone. 
(Word count: 940)



Her was a completely new experience for us. We never saw a movie quite like this one before. It always made us think, ask ourselves different questions, and imagine what our lives might be like in a similar situation. Can AI’s replace human love? was just one of the many questions the film threw our way. The way in which the story progressed was fluid and simple to follow. The themes present in the film were important and related directly with what we discuss every day in our class about the self. The movie is perfect for our day because with advancement in technology it is very possible that these interactive OS may be available in our lifetime. The possibilities of our lives connecting so much with the film and the ideas brought up make the film so much more interesting and enjoyable in our present day. 
                                                                                                                      Course Connections:

           1)      The self. Samantha, the OS that Theo uses and ends up in a relationship with, was programmed to converse with a human and have proper interactions while controlling or essentially being controlled by a computer. She has given herself a name and communicates with Theo in such a way that made it possible for them to have a loving and sexual relationship. She had the ability to read his feelings, respond to her own, have questions about emotions and know how to deal with others’ emotions. Many could then claim that she has a self-aware self, “This self can represent itself. It is the subject of experience but can also be the object of its experience. It can reflect. It can introspect. It knows it exists. It is an “I” with symbols of an “I”. It can represent its own consciousness.”. (Class Notes). All in all, this would classify her as a self from what we have discussed and learned in class.

"The past is just a story we tell ourselves" -Samatha

         
2)
      This leads to another topic we covered in class. Personhood. “define as the status of being a person. A legal or social category that will vary across cultures and across history. ‘Not all humans are persons and not all persons are humans.’” (Class Notes). The question of personhood is addressed in respect to Samantha. Theodore must decide if Samantha has personhood, even if she is just a voice in a computer. One could say she is her own person, as this is referenced and talked about numerous times throughout the film. The first time, for example, is when Samantha is first installed, she chose the name, Samantha. When Theodore asks why, she responds, “because I liked it”. Samantha uses the term “I” to describe herself, leading one to believe that there is more to her than just code. This is seen again when she is trying to convince Theodore to go on a date with a girl. Theodore says, “why am I having this conversation with my computer”, where Samantha responds, “you’re not having it with your computer, you're having it with me”. Again, she refers to herself as a person, disassociating herself from the computer. Further on in the movie, the idea of personhood is again put into question when Theodore is having an argument with Catharine. She claims that the emotions are not real, where Theodore responds, “they are real emotions. She’s not a computer, she’s her own person”. At this point, Theodore believes she is her own person, indicating that Samantha does indeed possess personhood. He then doubts himself and his relationship when he realizes that Samantha is acting like a person when all she is a voice in a computer. He even points out the small “gasps of air” she takes. “Why do you do that? People need oxygen, you don’t need oxygen, you are not a person. We shouldn’t pretend your something you’re not. Maybe we shouldn’t be in this right now.” Theodore is between two different ideas. That Samantha is not human, but that she does have personhood. This is asked by his friend right after Theodore had this big argument with Samantha. “Is it not a real relationship?”, making Theodore decide whether or not he can accept Samantha for who she is. 

Theodore with Samatha in the city

         3)      The ideology of the “uncanny valley, “Mori's original hypothesis states that as the appearance of a robot is made more human, a human observer's emotional response to the robot will become increasingly positive and empathic, until a point is reached beyond which the response quickly becomes that of strong revulsion. However, as the robot's appearance continues to become less distinguishable from that of a human being, the emotional response becomes positive once more and approaches human-to-human empathy levels.This area of repulsive response aroused by a robot with appearance and motion between a "barely human" and "fully human" entity is called the uncanny valley. The name captures the idea that an almost human-looking robot will seem overly "strange" to a human being, will produce a feeling of uncanniness, and will thus fail to evoke the empathic response required for productive human-robot interaction. (Class Notes). Samantha talks and acts exactly like a real person, but is just a voice. She even gasps for air when she talks, when Theodore and the audience both know she doesn’t need to. This clearly makes Theodore uncomfortable, as he brings it up and questions her about it in the movie. Another moment which has an uncanny effect on Theodore, as well as the viewers, is the scene with the OS surrogate. The OS surrogate is hired by Samantha in an attempt to give her voice a body. Theodore's facial expressions clearly display discomfort, especially when the interaction between him and the surrogate become sexual while Samantha speaks to him through his ear. It reaches the point where he can no longer continue, and the evening is cut short.

Theodore receiving a call from Samantha

 Questions for fellow Bloggers:

1. On what level do interactions with AI help us to develop and discover new things about ourselves?

2. Is it truly possible for a computer, OS, AI… to have a mind indifferent than the human mind? Is there anything that they do not have that is essential to human life?

3. If a social robot could love you back, could you imagine loving them? 


Amy and Theodore sitting together on the roof 

More information:

1.  https://gointothestory.blcklst.com/movie-analysis-her-5651e6e0c0be#.414a3s2mw Her is analyzed and discussions here arise on the OS and whether they have a self. Theodore Twombly evolves enormously in the film, as mentioned in this blog post.


2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2628150/Robots-NEVER-feelings-Mathematics-reveals-droids-experience-emotions-like-us.html According to this article, mathematics proves that robots are unable to have real emotions. They can carry out actions which we relate strongly with emotions, however they do not have to capacity to have feelings.

13 comments:

  1. Answering question # 2. So far, AI were and still are programmed to help and assist humans in their daily lives. What they are missing is the ability to pursue what truly interests them and to act in their best interest such as humans do. If they could learn and do what they really wanted, they’d be similar to humans, because humans act in their own interest and not for the interest of others. That is the reasons why AI’s mind are different from human’s minds.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Answering question #3, I believe that if a robot would be able to love me, I would have a hard time loving it back. The robot will always have something odd about them, which makes them fall into the uncanny valley, scaring most people including me. I believe that their presence would frighten me more than anything else. Also, the robot would only "love" you because it is programmed to do so and not for who you actually are and this would not attract me at all because I would know or at least believe that they don't care emotionally. On the other hand, I believe that if you were to be extremely lonely, you would fall for anyone, a robot in this case, who loves you only because you have the need to feel important and that would be enough for you to fall into the arms of a non-human. From my point of view, I don't think I could ever love a robot.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When I watched this movie a few years ago I asked myself number three as well. Throughout the whole movie you watch this man truly fall in love with an Operating System. You watch it tell the story in a way that makes you understand why and how as well and makes it seem not so outrageous. You see the emotional support that Samantha provides, the deep connection they have and the way they just instantly click like they've known each other for years. All those things are aspects people look for in a significant other.
    However personally, I don't think I would ever be able to surpass the fact that the OS and I click so well because that is what was programmed to happen. It is not some other person who just happens to be similar to me and has the same interests. It is a computer system that was programmed and specifically tailored to me. They don't have a past, they don't have a body and they are essentially your slave as you payed for them. If not for you, they would not have existed because there would have been no point for them to be created. They would not have existed beyond you.
    Also the voice, personality and fact that they feel like you are truly talking to an actual human paired with the lack of any body whatsoever would throw me off a lot. It would put these OS's into the uncanny valley because they are so similar to us but also so different at the same time. It would make me feel so uneasy and uncomfortable. Every time I would talk to these programs I would not be able to put all these aspects aside for long enough to actually fall in love with them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Overall, really good review of the movie. I viewed this movie when it had came out and I would have described it just like you guys did. The significance that you got out of the lightening was very well analyzed. This is an extremely odd movie, in my opinion, that has you kind of questioning why? and also how could a person even fall in love with a computer program. This relatively compares to the movie I viewed "A.I". In the movie A.I, a robot child is made for a family who is on the verge of losing their son. They gain an emotional connection and bond, just like Samantha and Theo in this movie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. From what I get from this summary and review is that the human falls in love with a computer software that has achieved self-aware self and personhood even though it does not possess a body. I find that most people would not be able to do that since Samantha is so close to being human yet she is not, therefore putting her in the uncanny valley. As we have learned in class, objects in the uncanny valley are usually rejected by humans. Also it shows a sign of desperation of the user, in this case the main character, since he needs something close to a relationship in order to bring his confidence back. I say close to a relationship because there are no compromises and everything she tells him is exactly what he needs to hear which in my opinion, does not make for a healthy relationship since there are no challenges. Their “love” is never put under pressure, it is never challenged. All of this taken into account, the OS program is not something that would work well in modern society.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I will be answering your first question: "On what level do interactions with AI help us to develop and discover new things about ourselves?" I believe that we can in fact learn a lot about ourselves when interacting with a robot. I believe that all interaction, with a living or non living, though social being can lead to self discovery. It is possible that this interaction with A.I. may in fact lead to a deeper self discovery for the following reason. When conversing with a human, both parties have their self interests. Both are trying to find something out from the other, though also may be censoring how much they will 'let out' about themselves, therefore limiting the conversation. In the end, the discussion will be self centered and lead to little self discovery due to human psychological barriers. Speaking to an A.I., their intentions are pure and there will be no censorship whatsoever. These luxuries will allow you a full exploration of your self while only discussing with the robot the topic of yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Question 2:
    I think it is not possible for technology to have a mind completely indifferent from a human mind. Computers were made by humans so that they can work for us and make our lives easier. They are fabricated. No matter how far we bring technology, the thing that will always make us different is that humans live through experience. It was seen that Samantha's brain at the beginning of the movie was based off of the knowledge she had due to the internet. She could make her own basic decisions like choosing a name that she liked, but she had difficulties and self-doubt when it came to the harder problems of consciousness. She was aware of herself but she did not know herself who she was and if she was capable of certain feelings like love.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The blog is really well written and I like how deeply you explained your ideas. The synopsis explains very clearly the overall movie which I really like. I understand that Theodore is developing a relationship with an artificial intelligence that is able to consider herself as a person but not as a human because, according to her, her feelings for Theodore are artificial and whatever she feels is also false. She can only be certain of her own conscience which makes me think about what we learned in class about Descartes. He would say: I think, therefore I am which is exactly what she is believing. It also, ironically, makes me think about Siri. I bet all of us at least tried to hold a conversation with her which shows that we would probably, like Theodore, be interested in this type of relationship (perhaps not a love relationship but at least as friends).

    ReplyDelete
  9. Question 3:If a social robot could love you back, could you imagine loving them?
    Yes, I can imagine loving it back, as loving something isn't restricted by what it is made of, or what is is. All that matters is that we love each other. Love is an emotion just like caring, and if society can care for their computers, and other devices that can respond to them, why not love too?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Question 1: Interacting with AI helps us develop more freely then if we were to interact with another human being. This is because AI, in this movie, holds no judgment and will not discriminate against you as they are programmed specifically to you.
    On the overall structure of your blog I find that you guys did a very good job at organizing everything and structuring it in a way that is easy to follow. Your plot review of the film was excellent and full.

    ReplyDelete
  11. To answer question 3 I believe that it would be hard to understand how to love a robot but I feel like if it was the norm I could maybe wrap my head around it. I feel like if a robot could have feelings towards me i think i might be able to feel less socially awkward about this action. If we are always on our computers, tablets and phones why couldn't we just bring our new girlfriend with us everywhere just like in the movie "Her".

    ReplyDelete
  12. Question 3: I feel as though I would have a hard time being able to love a robot, for one it’s not exactly normal to be in love with a robot and therefore could cause some problem with friends or family who are not accepting of it. I also feel as though being physically present with someone is important in any relationship. I would not be able to be in love with a computer screen because the fact that I would essentially always be physically alone would be depressing. Theodore and Samantha struggled with this in the movie and tried to hire someone to represent Samantha as a physical being and it caused problems. Theodore was still always alone.
    -Tayler Ferri

    ReplyDelete
  13. Answering question #2, I don't believe that a computer, OS, AI, etc. can have a mind of its own. They are all programmed by humans and those humans are the ones that creates their mind. For them to have a mind of their own would mean that they would have to build and program themselves. Artificial intelligence isn't at that point and won't be any time soon. Great blog with a lot of information and well written.

    ReplyDelete